| Mostly agree - especially about the application of the term "evil". |  | ||
| Re: Border security is nonexistent under the Xiden regime. -- Ihavenoname | Post Reply | Top of thread | Forum |
Posted by: LateForLunch ®  02/04/2023, 23:26:36 Author Profile Mail author Edit |
Not that the people of China are particularly worse than any other population, just that the government is largely ineffective in addressing many of the most egregious problems facing the country (which is a large and increasing problem for us as well). Xi is doing about all one can to contain/manage the chaotic violence of his national government's structure. It seems to me that the nation functions with systems that are mostly (1) deeply corrupt and (2) highly chaotic (largely unmanageable). So Xi is cast in the role of the King of Chaos. I wish I could speak with a neighbor about it to get his input (he's an officer in the British Air Force on loan to a U.S. base in the area to share info on thermonuclear weapons systems). As a layman, one concern I have is whether the Chinese are testing something other than the obvious. Since our scanning radars seem to be concerned mostly with large, faster-moving objects there might be a strategic weakness in difficulty detecting slow, smaller objects like balloons. I'm not sure I believe the government spokes-holes if they claim the balloons were detected and "effectively neutralized" before entering U.S. airspace. They might be obligated to lie if in fact they were not detected to avoid giving that information to the enemy. And that's another reason aerial incursions are so concerning - even though we do a lot of business with them, the PRC is still effectively an enemy nation - someone who very obviously might like to see the U.S. wiped out or at the very least, reduced to third-world status (eliminated as a competitor for global domination). If they could conceivably deploy hundreds of smaller EMP weapons over our territory instead of a few large ones, they might get the same (or worse) destructive effect (which could be catastrophic). It seems unwise to assume that planning hot war/aggressive first-strike scenarios are not part of any nuclear power's general focus. If they thought they could strike a killer blow with a first-strike, they might be insane (evil) enough to consider trying - even if they ended up killing millions of innocent civilians. Marxists are notoriously, historically indifferent to the suffering/slaughter of innocent human beings. To them, disagreeing with or opposing them strongly deserves a death sentence. Modified by LateForLunch at Sun, Feb 05, 2023, 00:16:13 |
| Post Reply | Recommend | Alert | Where am I? Original Top of thread | Previous | Next | Current page |
| Replies to this message |