|
I know he deeply despises Putin. Over time Levin often proves to be better-informed than I. That being said he is of course capable of error in some regards. I have yet to hear a consistent argument from a foreign policy POV as to why it is necessary for the US to get heavily invested in the outcome of what amounts to a bug tussle similar to the England/IRA conflict, or numerous other internecine disputes around the world.
Levin maintains that it's central to a strong foreign policy I suppose - though that is not his forte. Legal matters are his forte.
|